Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Sunday, 7 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

Most Organisations Face an Unsecured API Surge As AI Agents Outpace Security

The latest State of AI and API Security Report Finds Almost Half of Organisations Have Delayed AI Deployments Due to API Security Concerns

by Guru Writer
April 8, 2026
in Editor's News, Features
Most Organisations Face an Unsecured API Surge As AI Agents Outpace Security
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Salt Security has released its 1H 2026 State of AI and API Security: Navigating the Agentic Era report, revealing a widening gap between the rapid deployment of AI agents and the security programs designed to protect them. The research finds that while autonomous AI agents are being deployed at enterprise scale, 92% of organisations lack the advanced security maturity required to defend these environments.

AI is reliant on APIs in order to work properly and carry out autonomous actions. APIs are fast becoming the execution layer for AI systems, powering every action taken by agents, large language models (LLMs), and Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Because of this, the number of APIs in use in organisations today have exploded, with two-thirds (66%) reporting growth of over 50% in the last year.

However, as organisations scale AI-driven automation, security is failing to keep pace, creating what Salt Security defines as the “Agentic Security Gap”. The security of modern AI environments now requires visibility and control across the entire agentic AI stack, not just individual APIs.

Roey Eliyahu, Co-Founder and CEO at Salt Security, said: “You cannot secure AI agents without securing every layer they touch, including the APIs they call, the MCP servers they route through, and the data they access. Risk in the agentic era doesn’t sit in one place. It lives in how all of those pieces interact in real time.”

The research, based on a survey of 327 security leaders, reveals that while AI adoption is accelerating, security maturity is struggling to keep pace. Nearly half (47%) of organisations have delayed production releases due to API security concerns, and almost one third (32%) experienced an API security incident in the past year. Despite this, only 8% report having advanced API security maturity, leaving the majority underprepared. At the same time, two-thirds (66%) reported API growth of more than 50% in the past year, largely driven by increased automation and AI adoption.

Additionally, 79% of boards and executive teams have increased scrutiny of AI security risks, yet only 18% are extremely confident in their ability to detect attacks leveraging Generative AI, a confidence gap that reflects the inadequacy of legacy tools in agentic environments.

A key factor behind this confidence gap is a lack of visibility, which continues to be a critical weakness for many organisations. Fewer than one in four (24%) have a fully automated API inventory, with most still relying on partial or manual tracking methods. At the same time, nearly 90% of organisations are already using or planning to use generative AI in API development, introducing new and evolving security risks into the software lifecycle.

The findings also highlight a significant shift in the threat landscape, with attackers no longer forcing entry but instead operating within trusted systems, often via AI-driven processes. According to the data, nearly all (99%) attack attempts analysed by Salt Labs originate from authenticated sources, increasingly involving rogue agents using legitimate credentials but lacking human oversight, rate limiting or behavioural guardrails. In addition, almost two-thirds (65%) of attacks exploit security misconfiguration (OWASP API8), a vulnerability that is significantly amplified when over-permissioned APIs are connected to AI agents capable of querying, chaining and exfiltrating data at machine speed.

The report concludes that API security is no longer a subset of application or cloud security, but a foundational discipline in its own right. As APIs now account for the majority of web traffic and power all AI agent activity, they represent a distinct and critical attack surface that existing security pillars were not designed to protect.

To address this shift, Salt Security is advancing a new model for enterprise security called the Agentic Security Graph, which maps the relationships between LLMs, MCP servers and APIs. Together, these components form the agentic stack, providing the context needed to understand not just what AI systems generate but also what they do across enterprise environments. 

“Salt Security was founded on the belief that APIs are the most critical and most overlooked attack surface in the enterprise. As AI agents have emerged, it has become clear that APIs are just one pillar in a much larger, deeply connected system,” said Roey Eliyahu, Co-Founder and CEO at Salt Security. “Today, we secure the entire agentic environment, the llm, agents, MCP servers, APIs and the data they access. Our 1H 2026 research confirms that this isn’t a future problem, it’s happening now, and most organizations are not ready.”

ShareTweet
Previous Post

Check Point Software Celebrates Partner Success at Annual UK Partner Awards

Next Post

MIWIC26: Funke Omolere, Senior Technology Compliance Product Owner at Adobe

Recent News

Frontline Workers Twice as Likely to Use Unapproved AI

Frontline Workers Twice as Likely to Use Unapproved AI

June 4, 2026
Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
data-cloud-security

Building a Digital Fortress: Why Cyber Security Matters More Than Ever

June 5, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol