Eskenzi PR ad banner Eskenzi PR ad banner
  • About Us
Monday, 8 June, 2026
IT Security Guru
Eskenzi PR banner
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
IT Security Guru
No Result
View All Result

Only 16% of Businesses are Fully Compliant with NIS2 Despite 2024 Compliance Deadline

New research reveals budget constraints and lack of guidance as key barriers to NIS2 compliance, even as pressure mounts from partners and investors to prove it

by Guru Writer
April 15, 2026
in Editor's News, Insight
Only 16% of Businesses are Fully Compliant with NIS2 Despite 2024 Compliance Deadline
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

New research from CyberSmart has revealed that, despite a compliance deadline that has now passed, only 16% of businesses required to comply with the EU’s Network and Information Security Directive 2 (NIS2) are confident that they are fully compliant. Worryingly, 11% of respondents were unsure what NIS2 is, despite falling within its scope.

The CyberSmart NIS2 Survey, reveals insights from 670 business leaders across the UK, Poland, the Netherlands, Ireland, France, Germany, Denmark and Belgium. The survey, completed in late 2025, was conducted by OnePoll.

NIS2 is a European Union directive aimed at enhancing the security of network and information systems across EU member states. It applies to organisations operating in designated critical and important sectors, including some non-EU entities that provide services within the EU. The directive establishes cybersecurity requirements, mandating organisations to implement appropriate security measures and report significant incidents to relevant authorities. The deadline for member states to transpose the directive into national law was October 2024.

The findings also arrived at a critical moment for European cybersecurity at large. 2025 saw significant cyber incidents across the continent, including major disruptions to UK retailers.

While full NIS2 compliance remains low, CyberSmart’s research makes it clear that a lack of motivation is not to blame. 75% of respondents see at least some competitive advantage to compliance, and over a quarter (27%) believe that the advantage is significant. The top concerns around non-compliance were operational and reputational: loss of productivity (18%), reputational damage (18%), and loss of customers (18%) all ranked higher than fines (16%) or legal percussions (14%)

Instead, the primary barriers to full compliance are practical. Budgetary constraints were cited as the leading cause of non-compliance (20%), followed by a lack of guidance on how to implement the measures (16%), insufficient internal expertise (11%), and a further 11% who were unsure what NIS2 is, despite falling within its scope.

The pressure to comply is also coming from the market itself. As part of standard due diligence, 42% of respondents have been asked to prove NIS2 compliance by partners, 41% by investors, and 36% by customers or prospects. For UK and Irish businesses in particular, investor scrutiny was notably higher, with 58% reporting that they had been asked to demonstrate compliance.

Encouragingly, the survey also discovered signs of board-level engagement with cybersecurity. 60% of organisations have placed responsibility for cybersecurity compliance at the board or C-suite level, with CEOs most commonly cited (34%). Meanwhile, 95% of respondents believe their board at least somewhat understands the legal and reputational risks of non-compliance.

Alongside the NIS2-specific findings, the research paints a picture of broader regulatory strain. Most businesses across the UK and EU are required to comply with multiple frameworks simultaneously, from DORA (Digital Operational Resiliency Act) and the EU Cybersecurity Act to the UK’s GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation), and others.

The result clearly points to signs of fatigue: 42% of respondents indicated that there are too many regulations to comply with, 35% felt there was too much overlap, and 27% said that there is too much emphasis placed on regulation.

This points to a significant opportunity for managed service providers (MSPs). As businesses struggle to navigate an increasingly complex compliance landscape, there is strong demand for partners who can offer ongoing, multi-regulation compliance support, not just one-off certifications.

Jamie Akhtar, CEO and Co-Founder of CyberSmart said: “Our research shows that most organisations aren’t ignoring NIS2 – they’re stuck trying to implement it. Only 16% feel fully compliant, despite growing board-level ownership, real budget allocation, and a clear belief that compliance matters”,

“The problem is not motivation. It’s the gap between what the regulation asks for, and the practical support businesses have to deliver it – especially while juggling overlapping standards and limited internal expertise”.

“NIS2 is also changing how trust works in the market. Partners, investors and customers are already asking organisations to prove compliance, not just promise it. The organisations that succeed will be the ones that turn compliance into routine – and move from uncertainty to confidence.”

ShareTweet
Previous Post

How a Cyber Security Provider Protects Business Operations

Next Post

How the enterprise supply chain has created a global attack surface

Recent News

Frontline Workers Twice as Likely to Use Unapproved AI

Frontline Workers Twice as Likely to Use Unapproved AI

June 4, 2026
Nagomi Control Brings CTEM Into Action

IT Security Guru picks for Infosecurity Europe 2026

June 1, 2026
data-cloud-security

Building a Digital Fortress: Why Cyber Security Matters More Than Ever

June 5, 2026
Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

Nine in Ten Security Leaders Concerned About AI-Generated Code Risks as Salt Security Launches New Governance Tool

June 1, 2026

The IT Security Guru offers a daily news digest of all the best breaking IT security news stories first thing in the morning! Rather than you having to trawl through all the news feeds to find out what’s cooking, you can quickly get everything you need from this site!

Our Address: 10 London Mews, London, W2 1HY

Follow Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol

  • About Us
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Features
  • Insight
  • Channel News
  • Events
    • Most Inspiring Women in Cyber 2026
  • Topics
    • Cloud Security
    • Cyber Crime
    • Cyber Warfare
    • Data Protection
    • DDoS
    • Hacking
    • Malware, Phishing and Ransomware
    • Mobile Security
    • Network Security
    • Regulation
    • Skills Gap
    • The Internet of Things
    • Threat Detection
    • AI and Machine Learning
    • Industrial Internet of Things
  • Multimedia
  • Product Reviews
  • About Us

© 2015 - 2024 IT Security Guru - Website Managed by Dessol